Journal Issues‎ > ‎Tilamsik, 8(2)‎ > ‎

Composition Errors of Second Year Engineering Students of SLSU: Description and Pedagogical Implications

Nicanor L. Guinto, MAES 
Instructor III , Department of Languages, Literature, and Humanities
Research Coordinator, College of Arts and Sciences, Southern Luzon State University


Abstract

This exploratory research paper attempted to determine the nature, causes, and instructional relevance of composition errors in a corpus of 35 compositions written by second year Engineering students of SLSU, A.Y. 2012-2013. Analyzed in reference to the Error Analysis Framework of SP Corder and Jack Richards, results revealed that seven kinds of errors were commonly found in the corpus. The seven frequently occurring errors include errors in tense sequence, word substitution, embedding, preposition substitution, spelling, and article insertion and deletion. These errors are results of over-generalization, false concept about the rule, and ignorance to rule restrictions, and are representations of the learners’ idiosyncratic dialect or interlanguage. Hence, correction of errors in tense sequence, word substitution, and embedding must be given emphasis in class discussions. Errors in preposition substitution, spelling, and article insertion and deletion may be corrected when pedagogical focus calls for discussion of such concepts.

Keywords: error analysis, interlanguage, technical writing, writing instruction 

Full Text: PDF
Philippine Copyright 2016

References
Alinsunod, J. (2014). A Study on Common Writing Errors of Engineering Students: Basis for Curriculum Development. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 2(3). pp. 7-15.

Burt, M., & Kiparsky, C. (1978). Global and local mistakes, in J. Schumann & N. Stenson (Eds.). New frontiers in second language learning. Rowley. Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishing.

Castro, M. C. S. A. (2013). An analysis of prepositional errors of college students. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Foreign Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 97-108).

Corder, SP. (1971/1974). “Idiosyncratic Dialects and Error Analysis.” In Richards, J.C. [Ed.], Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. Great Britain: Longman. pp. 158-171.

Guinto, N., Sibal, M., & Villaverde, B. (2011). Functional English in a Global Society 1[Module]. Lucban, Philippines: Southern Luzon State University.

Miressa, M., & Dumessa, M. (2011). “Investigating factors contributing to grade nine students’ spelling errors at Don Bosco High and Preparatory School in Batu.” Journal of Language and Culture, 2(6). pp. 103-115.

Panaguiton, R.A. (2011). Treatment of Errors and Written Outputs of High School Students. (Unpublished Masters’ Thesis). University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.

Richards, J.C. (1972/1974). “Social Factors, Interlanguage, and Language Learning.” In Richards, J.C. [Ed.], Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. Great Britain: Longman. pp. 64-93.

Touchie, H. (1986). “Second Language Learning Errors: Their Types, Causes, and Treatment.” Japan Association for Language Teaching Journal, 8(1). pp. 75-80.

Walz, J. (1982). Error correction techniques for the FL classroom. Washington, USA: The Center for Applied Linguistics and Hacourt Brace Jovanovich.
Comments